this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
223 points (85.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers
218 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(i’m also gonna ambush my friends about Signal on sunday and coerce them to download it to get rid of the green bubbles)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  1. I'll eat my hat if that turns out to be a working defence for Disney, so as a reason to pirate, it's pretty feeble.

  2. Duh?

  3. Hardly. Hollywood is breaking box office records every other month, and the pirating community is very, very small compared to the larger population. Have you looked at video game prices lately? Movie ticket prices? Theyre out of control, seemingly not bothered by piracy in the slightest. Studio lawyers are going after piracy because they have nothing else better to do then pursue every point of revenue increase they possibly can, including going after the small fish.

But you forgot the biggest reason....It's free.

The large majority of people who pirate couldn't give a shit about "digital media preservation". Sure, people all have their own reasons, but to the other commentors point, most people are gonna delete shit right after they listen/play/watch it. Storage space is expensive.

[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How does this article show it was a valid defence? They withdrew, as they knew it clearly wasnt going to work for them, so im not sure what your point is...

load more comments (1 replies)