this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
189 points (94.8% liked)

Fediverse

28395 readers
248 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta announced that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own. In addition, posts that originated through the Threads API, like those created via third-party apps and scheduling services, will now be syndicated to the fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fitik@fedia.io 28 points 2 months ago (11 children)

@Auster@lemm.ee You can just use an instance that is defederated from them, that's the beauty of the Fediverse

According to https://lemm.ee/instances your instance already blocks them for example

@ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

can't you selectively block entire instances? you can in Boost

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

It's not just a matter of blocking Threads users.

Facebook is coming on here to slurp up data I don't want them to have, and enriching their own Threads ecosystem with Fediverse content they haven't lifted a finger to create.

Not to mention, when Threads users are able to fully interact in the Fediverse, do you really want that particular bunch to create noise in your communities? I don't. There's a reason why I avoid Facebook in all its forms.

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

right but if I block their instance, they can never interact with me and vice versa.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)