this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

4168 readers
2 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community

https://mapcomplete.org is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have recently got into mapping traffic signs and speed limits where I can, but I realised I don't know what to do when mapping differing speed limit signs that are offset from each other. It's a transition from a 50km/h zone to a 60km/h zone but the signs are offset by 65m, making a sort of "no-mans land" in-between. I plan to map it with the in-between zone tagged with separate maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward tags. I assume it should be done this way because as a driver on the ground I would follow the speed limit signs on my side of the road as I passed them, having no knowledge of the reverse sign.

I guess I'm wondering if this is a logical way to map this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Limfjorden@feddit.dk 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I plan to map it with the in-between zone tagged with separate maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward tags.

Maybe it would be better to use the lower speed limit in the "no-man's land", since it would be unfortunate to be driving too fast while thinking one is folliwing speed limit. I assume it's kind of ambigous what the allowed speed limit is?

For mapping, I agree with your logic. I just think we should err on the side of causion when things are ambigous.

[โ€“] sven@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Fair point! Better safe than sorry. On the other hand, drivers 'round here will go 20 over no matter what I designate it as lol. Kidding... kinda.

load more comments (2 replies)