this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
654 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2667 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
654
Court Rules in Pornhub’s Favor in Finding Texas Age-Verification Law Violates First Amendment (variety.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Court Rules in Pornhub’s Favor in Finding Texas Age-Verification Law Violates First Amendment::A Texas law requiring age-verification measures for porn sites, challenged by Pornhub and others, violates the First Amendment, a judge ruled.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Has anyone ever come out on top in a confrontation with the porn industry?

[–] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the article

At least five other states have enacted similar age-verification laws aimed at blocking access to pornography sites: Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Utah and Virginia. Pornhub, for one, after complying with the Louisiana law, subsequently opted to block access to users the other four states.

So only one of 6 have been overturned. And the others have existed longer. 

[–] jubalvoid@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

In fairness there was no confrontation in those states. Texas likely got the bonk because of requiring the disclaimer being a bridge too far, but the ruling explicitly blocks the age verification portion as well so it could be used as precedent against the other states now.

[–] Allectus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Virginia came later, for what it's worth.

load more comments (6 replies)