this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
848 points (95.4% liked)

Privacy

31981 readers
314 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should've looked into posting this in a different community.. It's closer to a silly "innovation".. soo.. is this considered FUD? I also don't support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had "privacy-violating" before the "solution".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrRedstoner@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Unless there will be disciplinary follow-up ( -> no reason for this design), I only see this going the way of de-facto scoreboards among kids.

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Considering it only detects if someone in the bathroom is vaping and not who, disciplinary action just isn't really possible with your typical school restroom.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The main picture says "Vape Sensor in Simon's Desk", so it sounds like each pupil's desk is going to have a sensor.

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

That's what I thought at first, but the person who wrote the article is named Simon, and based on the context given in the article I'm assuming that was a test unit he had on his desk, but the planned implementation is in bathrooms.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They can send people to investigate. Also you could just have someone outside. It should be fairly obvious.

It doesn't replace humans but it can compliment them. I'm not sure why people see this as a privacy issue. We aren't talking about some scary mass surveillance system here

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is taking the route of individual monitoring and public shaming to prevent vaping. That doesn't work, especially with teens.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It isn't individual monitoring. It is an alarm in the bathroom. It can also detect smoke from a fire.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And if there's one kid in the bathroom or a person posted by the bathroom watching the monitor? This feels very police state, monitor and enforce not educate and encourage.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Then how is the social pressure thing meant to work?

[–] MrRedstoner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Then why publish detection events like this? If they do start following up, all it does is warn perpetrators, and allow for fast iteration of anti-detection, to say nothing of other concerns people have mentioned (tripping other people's detectors etc.)

load more comments (7 replies)