this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
1580 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
3438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 111 points 2 months ago (12 children)

If OpenAI wants a pass, then just like how piracy services make content freely open and available, they should make their models open.

Give me the weights, publish your datasets, slap on a permissive license.

If you're not willing to contribute back to society with what you used from it, then you shouldn't exist within society until you do so.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago (9 children)

No they shouldn’t. They should cease to exist

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Generative AI is not going back into the bag. If not OpenAI, then someone else will control it. So we deal with them the next best way, force them to serve us, the people.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

Nobody should profit from copyright violation. Yes, copyright law needs to change, but making money isn’t an exception

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)