this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
-9 points (30.4% liked)

Lemmy

12548 readers
21 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Better than disabling it:

  • Understand it - low score boils down to "people don't want to see it". Everything else is assumption, and should be taken with a grain of salt.
  • Deal with it - you won't be able to please everyone all the time.
  • Vote - if you see some post/comment that you feel like undeservedly downvoted, by all means, upvote it.

I still wish that downvoting was multidimensional though. Negative feedback is important.

[–] SomeBoyo@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate on multidimensional up-/downvoting?

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine a system that works like this:

  • upvotes - a simple click, as it is now
  • downvotes - you click the downvote button, and then specify a reason from a list (disagreeable, unfunny, inaccurate, off-topic, rude, disingenuous, etc.)

So it's a bit like Slashdot, but only for negative reactions.

Each "reason" would be a dimension, as now you can measure content by funniness, accuracy, etc. And one of the effects of this system is that, if you are being downvoted, you'll have a better grasp on why. It's considerably more useful as feedback, for users in good faith.

(It has a few additional advantages too; for example custom sorting filters, and the very fact that a downvote takes a tiiiny bit more effort than an upvote should encourage positive feedback over negative one.)

load more comments (1 replies)