this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
918 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (22 children)

Here is what kagi delivers with the same prompt:

NB: quick answer is only generated when ending your search with a question mark

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 months ago (21 children)

Problem is, you cannot trust it's not hallucinating these stats

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And even if it's showing the correct number, you can't be sure how trustworthy the source is.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This applies to any information though, it’s got nothing to do with LLMs specifically.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not really, no. Sources of infornation gain a reputation as time goes on. So, even though you should still check with multiple sources, you can sort of know if a certain bit of information is likely to be correct or not.

On the other hand, LLM's will quote different sources and sometimes it will only provide them if you ask it to. Even then it can hallucinate and quote a source that doesn't actually exist, so there's that as well.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)