this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
310 points (93.3% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
343 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] z00s@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

The only genuine hint to the real reason of the refusal was "minimal abstinence outside of hospital".

Let me ask you bud, if you needed a liver transplant to continue living, would you have even one drink per week, or would you just quit completely?

Very biased article.

Plus, regardless of her husband being compatible, it still costs the state tens of thousands for the operation. In no way would it be ethical to put a new liver in someone who refuses to completely abstain from alcohol.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That's absurd. Refusing someone a transplant because they used to drink more than 3 drinks a week before they knew they even had liver problems is completely absurd. Calling her an alcoholic for that is even more absurd. What in the world are these people or you thinking?

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"minimal abstinence outside of hospital". That means she was still drinking.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Given her condition it's possible she never left hospital after her diagnosis

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)