this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
1126 points (97.0% liked)

Steam Deck

14856 readers
53 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/3922769

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/linustechtips by /u/RevolutionaryAd8204 on 2024-09-14 15:50:43+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 months ago (11 children)

If I'm playing modern games on a TV? PS5 easy. But still the pro over the deck.

I love my deck. As the handheld it's intended to be. It's not powerful enough for an acceptable experience running a AAA 3D game on a TV screen. You can ignore the resolution and artifacts and just generally low visual quality and poor frame rate on a small screen, because playing the games portably at all is a huge step up. You can't ignore any part of it on a TV. It's fine for indie games, older games, 2D stuff, etc.

But it doesn't have the performance for a good living room experience if you're looking to play modern AAA games. (Ignoring all their bullshit rootkits on PC that block a lot of multiplayer games out completely, which are the games you have to pay for on PS. You just can't play most of them on Linux at all.)

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Y'all just picky. 720 was fine 20 years ago and it's fine now.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Black and white TV was fine 60 years ago and it's fine now

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

20 years ago was pre-bluray, so the most common video media was dvd with resolution of 720 × 480 (480p). So 720p was really good 20 years ago.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That, and monitor/TV size increased a lot at the time when flat panels became a thing, so you need a higher resolution just to achieve the same pixel density you already had on a smaller screen.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Well also the change to pixel based screens from CRTs meant that you needed higher resolution for the picture to look comparitively good.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

It was not. 30 years ago, it would have been very good, though, as a lot of media was still SD.

load more comments (7 replies)