this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
79 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Change in leadership would also mean that the deal with AMD would have to be renegotiated, meaning that intel under qualcomm would not be legally able to create new 64-bit CPUs.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That sounds wrong, AMD is leasing from intel right? So if they sell then INTEL would still be able to make x86. IF anything AMD would be the one affected, unless I’m missing something.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, AMD actually did the 64 bit extensions, as a lot more.

AMD has been working hard in innovating whereas Intel has been working hard riding it's oen reputation into the ground whilst generating great short term profits for shareholders.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)