this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

Games

32586 readers
1835 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No idea what to make of this. Feels really random, but I guess we knew that Darkest Dungeon 2 didn't do as well as they wanted it to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Maybe it didn't do as well as they'd hoped, but back of the napkin guesstimates sure make it hard to believe DD2 wasn't profitable.

[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I played it in alpha (?) when it first came out and it was alright. I played it for like 3 hours, but never felt a desire to revisit it.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Darkest Dungeon was just one of them titles that isn't that suited for a sequel.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with the sentiment and it’s weird that it can be applied to quite a few recent games, frostpunk 2 comes to mind as the latest one of these

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

It's an attempt at piggybacking off the success of the first game, but they don't take the time to understand why it was successful and if a sequel is needed. I'd love to see devs try something new when they find success instead of just pumping out a number 2.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)