this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22059 readers
89 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[...]Using technology not unlike the regenerative braking found in hybrids and electric vehicles, the trains they rode generated some of the power flowing to the EV chargers in the nearby parking lot, the lights illuminating the station, and the escalators taking them to the platforms.

Every time a train rumbles to a stop, the energy generated by all that friction is converted to electricity, which is fed through inverters and distributed throughout the subway system. One-third of that powers the trains; the rest provides juice to station amenities and a growing network of EV chargers.

Each year, residents and tourists take 440 million trips on Barcelona’s subway system, which includes 165 stations linked by 78 miles of track. The transit agency has installed three inverters so far; 13 more are in progress. Once they’re all in place by the end of September, it expects regenerative braking to provide 41 percent of the energy needed to power the trains, a renewable source of energy it says will save about 3.9 metric tons of CO2 emissions annually.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sxan@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I... I don't get this. The trains are functioning as batteries? Regenerative braking is nice, but why is only a third going to power the trains themselves? Why not 100%? TFA says they're issuing the "spare electricity" in the grid; "spare?"

These aren't perpetual motion machines; they're not violating the third law, and they consume more energy than they produce. Most off these article is about the (obvious) benefits of adding regenerative braking to subways around the world, regardless of cost; what confuses me is: why are they spending money and effort to route regenerative braking into other uses, which is what the title literally says ("trains", not "train power grid"). It seems like an inefficient and circuitous way to tap other demands into a subway power grid.

Unless what's really happening is that Barcelona is just tapping other demands into the (robust) subway power grid, and coincidentally adding regenerative braking, and someone decided to make the wild conceptual link that the power being fed back into the grid by braking is part of the overall power being used by new sinks. Which is like saying that my piss is being used to provide drinking water, because it goes back into the overall water cycle one way or another.

[–] SteevyT@beehaw.org 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Could the regeneration be putting out a higher current than what the batteries on the subway train can handle? Not very likely, but I guess that's a possibility.

Or if the trains are running on an electrified rail and don't actually carry much battery capacity themselves so regenerative braking fills that small battery and then dumps the rest back to the grid?

I don't particularly feel that either of those situations are likely to be accurate, but I guess someone could have done something weird in the design.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I would guess it's the latter; the trains draw power from the grid to accelerate, and dump power back into the grid when they decelerate.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)