this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
50 points (94.6% liked)

Books

4508 readers
37 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
50
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by penquin@lemm.ee to c/books@lemmy.world
 

This may sound dumb, but I've never read for this man. I've always just heard about him on social media but never ventured to read his work. Opinions, please. Should I invest? Feeling like fiction lately. I've read so much non-fiction ~~through~~ throughout my life that I think I deserve a couple of fiction books to get busy with for a little while. Thanks in advance

EDIT: Thank you so much to all who answered. I have read and appreciated every single comment. I have decided to start with fairy tale since I ran into the book at Walmart. So giving that a shot to see. Thank you so much

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Very slow-burning books, and I almost always lost interest before finishing them. I found The Dark Tower especially tedious. After I couldn't force myself read it, I got the audiobook version a lnd tried to listen to it three times, but always fell asleep. Ironically, the books I genuinely enjoyed were some of his longest ones: It, and The Stand.

As Richard Bachman, on the other hand, he wrote loads of entertaining books. It almost seems like in that persona he didn't give a shit what others thought of his works, and the books ended up eminently readable.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

That bad? I'm getting mixed signals all over. Lol

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Like Tolkien, his writing style isn't for everyone. Some are drawn in by the madness and cosmic horror realized, others can't penetrate the veil and tune out. Then again, that's what's great about fiction and story telling. Finding what works best for you.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've read "the hobbit" last month and it was wonderful. I really enjoyed it. Then watched the movie and got really mad how they didn't follow story. Same thing with "the count of Monte Cristo", watched the 2000 movie and I wanted to go choke the director of the movie. WTH did they do that for. The whole story was messed up. Lol

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I never go into a movie expecting them to stay close to the book. To paraphrase Douglas Adams, each medium has it's own way to tell a story and you can't compare them equally

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get it, but the books were so good that the movies made me mad. Especially, the count of Monte cristo. That really got on my nerves. They actually modified the story to tell different events. :/

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm just sad that the middle earth movies didn't include Tom Bombadil. Yeah, it would have severely interrupted the movie flow but that's kinda Tom's whole deal.

The Hearts in Atlantis movie is wholly different from the book and I really can't get myself to enjoy the movie even when trying not to compare because the underpinning plot drivers were removed. It would be like doing King's Insomnia as a movie and not including the little doctors.

It's complicated and a difficult tightrope to walk for people who enjoy both book and movie stories

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)