this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
156 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1387 readers
416 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Right-to-repair advocates believe that car owners should have full ownership of the technology embedded in their vehicles

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

There’s nuance to this article. The cost is for the connected services portion, which usually includes the fee for the cellular connectivity the car has to enable the services, that’s not free and there is a cost to maintain that infrastructure. Additionally the “workaround” that someone provided still uses those connected services (again, not something that is just free to maintain).

The shitty part that comes in is that Mazda removed the key fob remote start option from their newer vehicles. That being said though, nothing in the above statements is centered around “right to repair”. If you don’t want to pay for the connected services, then don’t, everything else in your car will still work.

About the only way you could argue for it is a “bring your own SIM” approach but even then, where would it connect to? Who would pay to maintain that? You’d have to allow it to connect to a custom endpoint, but at that point guess what: you’re paying for the cellular connectivity and the server to host an API on to do what you want. That’s still an additional cost beyond what you paid for the car just like the connected services fee.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bring your own SIM would be a perfectly reasonable answer if somebody could do it. IOT Sims are relatively cheap.

Honestly what I'd really like to see is it bind through Bluetooth to your cell phone. What your remote start from a couple hundred yards away it's not nothing.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I use my remote start on the other side of the building through countless walls and floors away from my car. Bluetooth is good up to 30 feet.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Then that's something you can pay for.

Bluetooth 4 can go 200 ft line of sight. For most people that's enough.

load more comments (2 replies)