this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
562 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (21 children)

I'm all for it, and it's just the usual "moores law" trend, I just wonder if we won't hit a wall where (most!) users just won't need it?

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Its already been 6 years since the first 100TB SSD released and I still don't think anyone has bothered to dethrone it last I checked. Density and number of layers possible have both increased since then. I imagine part of it is just a performance issue though; 10 10TB SSDs are gonna be faster than 1 100TB SSD.

At the consumer level, the usage of smaller form factors will probably mean more density will still be useful. Things like the steamdeck drives will benefit for a while.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 1 month ago

64TB ssds are fairly common in the enterprise market now, I don't think they were 6 years ago. It's possible we'll see 128TB SSDs become fairly common on servers in a few years.

load more comments (19 replies)