this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
-3 points (20.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3296 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Eeeyep...and there's nothing we can do except be 'civil' to them.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Pitiful.

Have you seen the modlog for this person? Completely different writing style, different bizarre fixations, and constant bans are in their past. Truly a bizarre case.

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=9454261

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We all wear different faces and exhibit different behaviours in different places, so I'm not surprised with this. This forum's moderators protect this user, so the best you can really do is either take the bullet for the team and try to engage them with cold, hard logic, or just downvote and move on. This guy's trying to get Trump elected. That's all we need to say.

[–] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They apparently went a tear one day ranting about losers with AI girlfriends, as though that is a thing period.

This guy’s trying to get Trump elected.

No doubt about that.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Japan does have a thing going on with AI girlfriends, as well as other alternatives to dating. I've also heard that it's a thing with some in the Nerd community. I can understand why. Relationships are hard. Agreeing to share your life with a chick (or dude) is hard, requires lots of communication skills and some extra dose of humility. I can see why AI dates are more fun. The AI just knows how to string words together in a way dating has been done over history, in a way that doesn't involve the AI's hopes and dreams (which they don't have). I can see plenty of room to look at that and think it's a bit crazy. Heck, I think that's a bit strange. Then I shrug and go back to my RL wife and my day to day concerns and let people have their AI BFs or GFs and let it be. I got much more important things in my life to worry about...such as ensuring my wife isn't ground under the bootheel of oppression because the Dems aren't doing exactly what some whiny commentor on Lemmy wants them to do.

No doubt about that.

And this is why we need to work and work hard to ensure that BS like 'Dems no better than Reps' gets shut down every time it rears its ugly, stupid head on here (or anywhere else, for that matter).

load more comments (1 replies)