this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
152 points (71.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9627 readers
621 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago (38 children)

Walking on them is literally the entire purpose of sidewalks. I mean its right there in the name. This picture is exactly why - so they're safe from cars and don't obstruct drivers. Your opinion of cars is completely immaterial when determining who is being reasonable in this context.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (34 children)

I don't disagree with you on a rational level, but on a human level, it just sometimes feels nice to walk a different route, to not be forced to walk in exactly a straight line, especially with a ridiculously narrow sidewalk like that.

And that's then where the opinion of cars comes in. I'm not supposed to do what I feel like, because some guy with a car decides to head on through. If I think cars are vital to humanity, I'll gladly do the rational thing. If I think cars are killing humanity, then sincerely fuck that noise.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (31 children)

Holy Entitlement.

"Yeah, there's this whole path for pedestrians, and that whole path for cars, but sometimes I just want to be on the car one for no reason, so cars should be inconvenienced for that."

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

MLK argued that change requires agitation. Since cars should be mostly banned from pedestrian areas I fully support any effort to retake space and to inconvience cars. Any effort to make driving more painful for others chips away at car dependency

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The road is not a pedestrian area.

The infrastructure should be changed, but the driver is not in a pedestrian area.

Further, risking your safety and potentially setting an innocent person up for an accident is a dick move.

Advocate for change. I'm into that. Smart towns and cities are making progress and I'm all for it. Don't put people at risk.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

What a gross ideology.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)