this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
620 points (98.9% liked)

Games

16737 readers
503 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Larian director of publishing Michael Douse, never one to be shy about speaking his mind, has spoken his mind about Ubisoft's decision to disband the Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown development team, saying it's the result of a "broken strategy" that prioritizes subscriptions over sales.

Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown is quite good. PC Gamer's Mollie Taylor felt it was dragged down by a very slow start, calling it "a slow burn to a fault" in an overall positive review, and it holds an enviable 86 aggregate score on Metacritic. Despite that, Ubisoft recently confirmed that the development team has been scattered to the four winds to work on "other projects that will benefit from their expertise."

This, Douse feels, is at least partially the outcome of Ubisoft's focus on subscriptions over conventional game sales—the whole "feeling comfortable with not owning your game" thing espoused by Ubisoft director of subscriptions Philippe Tremblay earlier this year—and the decision to stop releasing games on Steam, which is far and away the biggest digital storefront for PC gaming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (27 children)

Gamers be like "We don't mind not owning our games as long as we don't own them through the monopoly that we like, ok?"

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ya I trust Steam more than Ubisoft. I feel like that's pretty reasonable?

[–] v0rld@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure that's reasonable at the moment. And while it seems Gaben would never sell out, he is going to die at some point. What's going to happen to steam / valve after that?

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Lets fight the battles we've got, man.

The inner-circle at Valve might be tighter than we assume. The next three or four in line might be just as aligned with Gabe. There's a chance they aren't, but Gabe made it this far with the people he's working with, I'd say he probably picks people he trusts.

[–] v0rld@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope you're right. I'm future proofing anyway by preferring DRM-free stores when possible.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Let Joy have the console for a while, Anxiety.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't know. We'd probably have to re-evaluate the situation when it comes to that.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just pointing out the hypocrisy

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago

Do you really find no difference in buying games (or the license to play them) and subscription services?

load more comments (24 replies)