this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
1300 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
5324 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miffmaff@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (19 children)

So as far as i know, firefox is the only mayor browser not based on chromium. Also, firefox is dependent on google's funding because of a search engine exclisivity deal. So my understanding is that, if google decides to kill firefox, they could easily do that. Well, what then? Is there any other browser left wich similar features that would be untouchable by google?

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They couldn't kill Firefox without having the US government come down on them for monopoly. Which the government is already looking at https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/24/tech/doj-google-lawsuit/index.html , so it's not likely Google will risk it even further by shitting down funding to Firefox. Pretty sure they'll point at Firefox to claim they're not a monopoly.

[–] karma_nder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the lawsuit appears to be looking at Google as a search engine monopoly, not web browser, right? And if I'm understanding this right, assuming this lawsuit goes anywhere, it would actually incentivize Google to pull funding from Firefox to no longer support that search engine exclusivity deal.

[–] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Google still benefits from having Firefox around, so that they can maintain less of an appearance of a monopoly in the browser space. Whatever way they fund Firefox, it's still to their benefit to do so.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is pretty much the same situation as when Apple faced bankruptcy a while back and Microsoft essentially bailed them out.

Having an effective monopoly is better than a literal one for legal reasons

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

We need to extend our laws to effective monopolies too, fuck this shit

load more comments (16 replies)