this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
416 points (99.8% liked)

Linux Gaming

19703 readers
603 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 237 points 8 months ago (62 children)

The fact that companies think client side anti cheat is a good idea is so insane. Maybe try designing your server better instead of blaming the operating system for not letting you control your users

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (58 children)

Genuinely curious, because this isn't my area of expertise, but how do you design a server to be "better" if it has to trust data from a remote client?

Example, if the client is compromised - because as they've said, they have no way to "attest" that the kernel is not compromised - how would the server know any better?

If my Apex client tells the server I got a perfect headshot, how would the server know I didn't fake the data? Is there a real answer to this problem or are we just wishing they come up with an impossible solution?

My general understanding is that EA is 100% correct. Now, on the other hand, maybe the should just limit plays between Linux <-> Linux so people can at least still enjoy the game (I'm moving to Linux soon so I'll basically no longer be able to play the game, which is, as my primary gaming addiction, a huge loss I'm willing to take).

There's compromises EA could take, but I think the Linux market share is just too small for them to care to spend any resources - even though they're raking in billions (~$3.4 Billion) and could spare a few resources to find a good middle ground. Capitalism at it's finest.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

how do you design a server to be "better" if it has to trust data from a remote client?

By minimising the trusted data exchanged and checking it against server side data.

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

They already do this, so this doesn't solve the problem.

load more comments (56 replies)
load more comments (59 replies)