this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
256 points (97.1% liked)

Linux

48208 readers
709 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Why? What's the issue with Snap? Is Flatpak any better?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Yeah, Flatpak is far better. The most glaring issue: Canonical hosts the only Snap backend, you can't host it yourself. Flatpak on the other hand is fully open.

Don't introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

[–] TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Don’t introduce proprietary crap just so companies can profit off of it.

I agree but I think it's the user who should be able to make the informed choice (ie. during installation)

[–] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a stupid argument. In FSF's eyes even having nonfree repository (ie. for drivers) is bad so this is completely irrelevant for anyone considering flatpak or snap. Both have nonfree stuff in there.

[–] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Both have nonfree stuff in there.

But flatpak's backend is open source and self-hostable, while snap's is proprietary and not self-hostable. Flatpak is the lesser of evils from this point of view.

I'm not arguing whether snap or flatpak is better. Flatpak is better.

But your arguments are going against each other. You disagree that FSF should tell you what software you can use but then you want to tell other users what software they can use. If you use flatpak despite of FSF's opinions, you should let people use snap despite of your opinion.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)