this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
660 points (97.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21192 readers
378 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 77 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (23 children)

    As entertaining as that is, it does raise the question - why do they put all of the details on the back now?

    I thought one of the main reasons that the CVV was on the signature strip was so if a card was photocopied, photographed, or carbon copied (literally on carbon paper), then it was still less possible to clone the card.

    Is "physical" cloning so small of a problem now that it's more beneficial to make fancy looking cards? Anyone in the industry able to shine a light?

    [–] noredcandy@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago (18 children)

    This is an EMVCo chip card, and not an American one so it’s chip and pin most likely. Without getting too detailed, the chip generates a one time use code for each transaction, so just having the number wouldn’t help with cloning the card plus you also would need to know the PIN. Although skimmers still exist and physical card theft is a thing, it’s less common especially in markets that use chip and pin.

    [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    I'm in the US, and all of my cards have the numbers on the back now, and they're not raised. I'm pretty sure we transitioned to chip and pin like a decade ago.

    [–] noredcandy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    The US uses chip and signature, no joke, because the banks didn’t think people could remember another PIN.

    [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    Even though the you already have to use the PIN at an ATM.

    No idea why there’s such a big functional difference between “credit” and “debit” cards.

    [–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    I don't think there is in terms of process, I think payment handlers just add a higher charge for processing credit card payments, which is why stingy retailers dislike them.

    I'm happy to be corrected though.

    [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

    The only time I’ve been prompted to enter a PIN is when using the same card as a debit card vs a credit card.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (15 replies)
    load more comments (19 replies)