Not to continue beating a dead horse, this article is really about mainstream media's relationship with video games, or the lack thereof. For the first time in my life, I pay for a subscription to news, because the same problems that crop up from getting news from reddit happen just as easily here in the fediverse. There are actually really great pieces written about video games and their creators in the New York Times, but they've only got a couple of bylines between them, and a frequency that matches how many people they've got working on it. Meanwhile, they do have a section under Arts dedicated to Dance, which I somehow doubt has anywhere near as many readers interested in the subject.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RonnieB@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (20 children)

A game no one heard of until it shut down isn't that interesting of a story. It's not that deep.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 53 points 1 week ago

It's interesting in the sense that something went catastrophically wrong here.

This isn't just a small indie dev wasting a bit of money, it's hundreds of millions set on fire by an established company in this industry.

The fact that "no one heard of it" is exactly the point. What went wrong here?

load more comments (19 replies)