this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
899 points (98.9% liked)

Political Weirdos

725 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (14 children)
[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

Or doesn't know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

I don't know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it's because I'm not into any sketchy shit.

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's an old term for a pleasure slave.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, concubinage was typically consensual.

By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I'm trying to remember the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase it here: 'In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.' https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago

Historically consent has often been quite optional, when it comes to marriage, concubinage, and the like...

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)