this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
218 points (95.8% liked)

PC Gaming

8563 readers
678 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geography082@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Tbh sounds fair. I mean keeping systems secure is not cheap task . If we can kep using w10 without all the “free AI “ shit , is not bad . I mean they will get their income from w11 from it on users… From users data. They should add windows clean with the office subscription and a not clean option . I would not say free. We are used to think that free is better, but there are a lot of time invested in development and updates. Linux free distros are not so secure, they even do a statement you have to agree to use them. that’s why companies pay Read hat .

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

...windows 10 was free to a lot of people; it's a pretty solid OS and i'd be happy to pay a fair price for ongoing support...

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Unless you pirated W10 it was not free. The price of laptop and PC hardware with Windows per-installed is subsidized.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 week ago

...i should clarify: upgrades from windows 7/8 were free...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)