this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
40 points (87.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8563 readers
543 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Why do they need a patent for this? How would this not conflict with just tv remotes? Like it's not a bad feature, but blocking anyone else from having a rewind button without paying them seems like an overstep for such a basic addition.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why do they need a patent for this?

Because if they did it without one, anyone could do it.

If they get the patent, even if they don't do it, anyone who does have to pay them.

How would this not conflict with just tv remotes?

Video games and TVs are different enough devices

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You got a little Sony on your upper lip there pal

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I think givesomefucks is more explaining than defending the process in their comment.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)