this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
294 points (98.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
731 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 134 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Honestly, not even mad. Sucks for the victims, but we need hackers poking holes in kernel anticheats. Show the game companies that kernel anticheat is a waste of effort and maybe this horrific plague of gaming will die off.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago (13 children)

The issue is that without it cheating is so much easier in many games. So then people just get pissed at all the hackers.

[–] Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Yes, if they offload all of the compute for anti-cheat to the customer's hardware, then you are right for current operating systems.

Client side anti-cheat is not the only way but it is the cheapest way for the game industry.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)