Linux

5234 readers

116 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Script to install Brave and Vivaldi variants on Fedora Atomic (github.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Easily install your favourite browsers on Fedora Atomic Desktops, Silverblue, Kinoite, uBlue, Bazzite, Aurora, Bluefin, Secureblue etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (23 children)

Is there any good reason to use Vivaldi? Nice to see more scripts from you. I have been thinking about making some scripts to automate the deployment of Bubblejail profiles for different apps. I don't run nearly anything without sandboxing, and Bubblejail does not interfer with the Chromium sandbox.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dont use Vivaldi haha, but their installation is so weird that I wanted to fix that.

I use Firefox and since bubblejail has support for firefoxes name on Fedora (bubblejail is strange) I tried it and got memory issues or something, pretty crazy.

I think vivaldi is just as fine as regular Chromium, probably slower patches. A debloated Brave will be better for privacy.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

No, not for browsers.

Chromium Browsers may be secure, but afaik there was no security audit of Chromium Flatpaks. Their sandbox is highly modified, so one would really make sense.

load more comments (21 replies)