this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5244 readers
229 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's still somewhat unclear how effective CCS will be but it's definitely showing promise. We already have a couple active in my State and the world's largest one, Project Bison ,is currently being built here.
If you are curious CarbonCapture's DAC will initially be powered by a mix of Natural Gas and Wind Power but will transition to full Solar & Wind power as it becomes available. We're also building the nation's largest Wind Farm, and one of the largest in the world, which will speed the transition and allow for future expansion.
I know that BigOil get's a lot of well deserved hate but try to keep an open mind with CCS, in the end it's the only practical way we can currently sequester all of the CO2 we dumped into the atmosphere over the last 200 years of coal burning.
And that's why it's unrealistic. That's a lot. And it's not only in the air, it's in the oceans, too. The scale at which CCS needs to work is...honestly almost impossible for me to wrap my head around.
Not to mention, oil companies use CCS to justify their business model. Because, if you can remove CO2 in the atmosphere, why not dump more?
Me too. The amount of CO2 that needs to be captured and sequestered is so enormous that it boggles the mind. Still, everything helps and the best time to start is now.
I'm not supportive of this line of thinking unless we can reliably capture at least 500% of yearly global CO2 emissions. There's some future merit to their argument but not right now.