this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
127 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

iPhone 15 Models Have 'Completely Standard' USB-C Port Without Restrictions on Accessories::Apple's new iPhone 15, iPhone 15 Plus, iPhone 15 Pro, and iPhone 15 Pro Max are equipped with a "completely standard" USB-C port without...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cookie1990@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Linus from LTT had a good idea where this comes from, the Apple Silicon in this generation of iPhone doesnt have a better usb controler. That could explain it, the time from defining a cpu to the first device are 4-5 years.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely with all the space they saved by removing the headphone port, they could get a controller in there

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not just the controller, it's the bandwidth to the CPU too. The old controller was limited to USB 2 speeds and Apple probably wasn't planning to expose more on that port.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They're using an apb node of the main axi bus, they need to promote usb to a full axi node or put it on a faster clocked apb node.

Power Islanding, but also the IP isn't drop in, if they're using synopsys there's a few changes they have to make, it's a much bigger block.

load more comments (1 replies)