this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1261 points (85.4% liked)

Linux

48045 readers
807 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reading about FOSS philosophy, degoogling, becoming against corporations, and now a full-blown woke communist (like Linus Torvalds)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I honestly don't even know what a Marxist is.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Marxism is the classical version of communism developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. As opposed to later ideologies such as Marxism-Leninism and Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, marxism is a lense through which to analyze capitalism. It isnt communist by itself, although marx was a communist.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s both, criticism of capitalism and the inevitability of the communist revolution were part of the same philosophy. I suppose you could make an argument that a non-communist dialectical materialist is also a Marxist, though I’ve never seen it used that way in practice.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

suppose you could make an argument that a non-communist dialectical materialist is also a Marxist

That's my argument

though I’ve never seen it used that way in practice.

Sometimes capitalists spout marxist shit and it is recorded. Marxist capitalists are the worst because they have an understanding of the contradictions their counterparts dont. More commonly there are non communist Marxists in philosophy.

I agree that almost all Marxists are communists, I just felt your initial response was a simplification that lost more meaning in the simplification than it necessarily needed to.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I only got my undergrad in philosophy so I’d certainly defer to someone with more experience in the field, but I’ve only ever heard the term with regards to his economic theories.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

:gulp:

I have no formal training in philosophy maybe I need to read less philosophy if philosophy undergrads aren't being exposed to it

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, undergrads read almost zero Marxist literature, almost 100% from Marx and just a tiny bit from Engels. The rest is memory-holed from history.

I think Marxism is functionally but not technically inherently communist on the grounds that it avoids discussion of moral values and things like that.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd argue you're just describing vulgar idealist(as opposed to materialism, not cynicism) philosophy.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Remember idealist/materialist in a philosophical context is, in its most common use, a metaphysical distinction. Marx's use of "idealism" is based on this but isn't the same.

But an important element of Marxism is that it ascribes strategy based on a) class position and b) conflict-aversion. If you are a prole or you just want to play it safe, even as a member of the bourgeoisie, it tells you that socialism is the best way to accomplish that goal, but it's by the same framework that it can give a capitalist insight on how to practice capitalism with still-more-brutal efficiency if that is what they want.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't it extremely common to accept only some of a person's ideas? Most modern historians and sociologists would agree that history is mostly driven by material forces rather than by 'great men' or supernatural forces. Doesn't mean they have to be communists.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)