this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Rust

5999 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BB_C@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Ah, the good old RHEL promise of quality, stability, and security.

Can't wait for the ~~CentOS~~ Alma version... oh wait, no copyleft!

I will stick with ~~arch~~ rustc, thank you very much.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Well, of course you should stick to rustc if you don't need the certification. I get the impression you mix up thing and the purpose of a certified compiler.

Ferrous Systems is working on certifying a specific version of rustc, and hence make it possible to use rust for projects where such certification is required. And certification is required for things like programming medical equipment. If you are hooked in to life support, it is good if the compiler did the thing it was supposed to do.... a crash in such programs can be fatal in a very literal way.

Also, notice that they try to do this without forking and by contributing upstream.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

First of all, sometimes I write in a stream of consciousness half-jerking style. It's not meant to be taken 100% seriously. I thought the writing style itself, when I do that, makes that clear!

Secondly, whatever that is of real technical value from the Ferrocene project, wasn't sold well by that ad. This could be by design, and maybe no one here would fall under the target audience of it. But then, I would question the point of posting this ad here in the first place.

Thirdly, the ad mentions nothing regarding Ferrocene's general availability (binaries, source, source+binaries, neither), nor is there any mention of software licenses. I think you would agree that mentioning this directly in the ad would have made it infinitely more informative for readers around here.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

You are free to see this as an ad, but as Rust is targeting safety critical programming in general, I find it interesting to follow certification efforts like this to make rust available for really safety critical use cases. Now, the Ferrocene project is contributing back, but that fact or the license does not really affect the relevance for this community.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)