this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)

Fediverse

18780 readers
33 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/57576884

There's so many ways to interact with the Fediverse. The most popular, by far, seems to be Mastodon, but Lemmy, Misskey, and Pixelfed are also relatively popular. Kbin used to be popular, but it has apparently been abandoned, and is mostly dead at this point.

I recently learned that Mbin is a thing, checked it out, and it looked really cool! Has anyone used it? How different is it from Lemmy? I hear they have better integration with Mastodon.

What Fediverse services do you actually, regularly use?

For me, it's mostly Lemmy, though I do hop on Mastodon every now and then.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gon@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I've learned about so many different federated services with this post, it's crazy...

What do you like about Wafrn?

Quite frankly, I feel like Misskey/Sharkey/Mastodon/Pleroma are basically the same. I mean, sure, they do have some differences, but it really doesn't matter. Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm very meh on all of those. I keep Mastodon, but that's it.

Also, thoughts on Piefed vs Lemmy? I've been getting a lot of feedback on that and I'm starting to get the impression Piefed has a lot of potential, maybe more than Lemmy. What do you think?

[–] Palladiumasteroid@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Wafrn: As of now it's the Tumblr-style microblog platform that it's closer in terms of content and energy to the original. Goblin has the pro that being a misskey fork has more app options, while wafrn only has only that for now it's in close beta (although I access it through the phone browser no issues), but Goblin seems more serious in its content and interactions (or at least that was my perception)

I think misskey and it's forkeys are it own thing in both terms of features and user base. Akkoma (can't speak about plain pleroma) and Mastodon are similar, but Mastodon has , how to say it, this issue where they spend years shitting on features half the Fediverse have to then add it and pretend they're doing something revolutionary. Also, I don't know why but all the Mastodon servers I've been have had limitations or outright forbid image uploading, telling you to instead open a pixelfed account; I've never seen someone like that even in the crappies key/oma instance. That not even mentioning the toxicity (much of it inherited from twitter during the migrations) that exist in Mastodon.

Piefed like that you can join or abandon communities by topic on piefed and that it ask you if you want to see content with certain topics. Lemmy has the advantage that it has more app options, but it's harder to filter content there and, at least on the server I was, half of the time the search gave no results. Tbh, I think we need a Lemmy fork because that's the only way the community it's ever getting all the user friendly changes it needs. The things that Lemmy lacks it lacks on purpose, there's an active decision to not have them. Different from kbin, I actually like Lemmy, but I agree that PieFed has a lot of potential and as of now haven't had any issues with it.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I'm really excited for the future of the Fediverse, with all these apps, but it's just too much...

I'm not advocating for anything, but some of these are definitely gonna get culled.

[–] scott@loves.tech 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A marketplace of apps is actually a good thing. Not everyone wants something based on Twitter (i.e. Mastodon, and similar). Not everyone wants Reddit (Lemmy, Mbin, etc.). Not everyone wants a traditional forum (NodeBB). Not everyone wants a blog (WordPress, Hubzilla, etc.). Not everyone wants Facebook (Friendica, Hubzilla, etc.).

One of the goals is to build increased compatibility between apps so that you can choose which experience you want, yet can still talk to anyone else on the fediverse. Some big players will certainly emerge, but I think that there will always be hundreds of compatible apps.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe... I do see your point.

[–] scott@loves.tech 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We never know what the future holds. But one of our goals is to decentralize social media. If we wind up with only a few major players, we have failed in that goal.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

Well... Is that true, I wonder. Is that what decentralization means?

Software wise, these are open-source projects with strong community contribution. Just a few major players doesn't imply just a few major servers, so no one company or project can ever truly dominate.

Additionally, just the threat of forking could be enough of a deterrent for more authoritarian services not to implement anti-user features. Say Lemmy sells out or something; Lemmy.ml might turn bad, but that means nothing to .world or .ee or any other server. They can just... Not update. Not implement the bad features. Lemmy can just be forked. That's not like Twitter or Facebook.

Right?

I'm not a tech wizz or anything, but that's my understanding of the spiel of the thing of the stuff.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)