this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
1091 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

58143 readers
4443 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 102 points 11 months ago (55 children)

Wow, USB-C and DDG in the same year? Look at Apple trying to stay relevant 😉

[–] MrGeekman@lemmy.world 204 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They didn’t switch to USB-C out of the goodness of their hearts. They switched because the EU passed a new law that requires that new smartphones have USB-C ports.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 131 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And they actively fought against it for as long as they could, tooth and nail.

[–] dunestorm@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It’s an uphill battle, why would Apple bother when just using USB-C makes sense and saves them their lawyers sanity?

[–] docmox@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Money.

Now that USB-C is the required cable, people can go out and buy any cheap cable they want. The law turned a proprietary cash cow into a low return commodity item.

[–] Redcedar@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This argument always cracks me up. I have been able to buy cheap lightning cables effectively since they started making lightning cables lol. It’s not like Apple somehow locks the phone from charging, physics is still a real thing and electricity can still flow through them, even without the MFi aspects.

If you wanna hate Apple for being a massively bloated and money-hungry corporate nightmare, that’s fine, I’m with it, but do we really all think they made it to $3 trillion valuation on… fucking cables??? 😂

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No, they made it to 3 trillion with cables, overpriced PCs, overpriced notebooks, overpriced Phones, overpriced watches, and locking software of all these so the easiest way to use different devices together, is to use another apple product.

Oh, and cultivating a fan base of people who uncritically buy anything they make with the notion that it's "better than anything else" when in reality that could not be further from the truth.

[–] Redcedar@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so you listed basically all of their business strategies, which is exactly my point. It’s not a business built SOLELY on proprietary ports and cables, yet that aspect is what gets the most attention and criticism.

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say that's really accurate. It is true that it is the aspect that is getting the most attention now, but thats only because its recent, in the news and EU forced their hand upon it.

Apple among regular consumers has been criticised for years, if not decades for its overpriced hardware and among more technical crowd has always been criticised for its closed source and incompatible software.

Of course, people who say their entire empire is built upon a bunch of cables are wrong lol

[–] Redcedar@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Correct! For me, the closed source “walled garden” approach is the most frustrating.

But, dude, dude, dude… remember the 30-pin transition debacle? I’m having bad flashbacks lol

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I am not old enough to remember that I'm afraid. But I do still have some of those 30 pins phones and chargers

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah but there has to be some reason they were so opposed to this. I don’t get it either though.

[–] whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

Apple wants to keep selling overpriced cables to losers.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Apple will never do anything for any other reasons besides: regulation and profit. They try and foster this image of humanitarianism and ethics, but meanwhile they build everything in sweatshops and make their own "standards" so that their loyal customers can only use the functions they need by purchasing additional dongles.

I'm happy that they were forced into an actual standard, but I've already heard at least two apple users IRL claiming that USB-C is inferior for [insert random reasoning here]. Apple has cultivated the idea that they are above standards for a long time and it will take a long time to break.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

You mean, just like every company that exists?

[–] Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 2 points 11 months ago

The only reason they pass on an image of ethical environmentaly friendly company is because its good for business. People like that shit the products are good people buy. Its that simple. Companies give no shit about people or the planet.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Apple fanboys are the most frustrating people to talk to.

They find any illogical reason to justify what apple does.

[–] MrGeekman@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I know. That's my point. A great example of this is when they used to brag about how eco-friendly their product were. I remember them bragging about their displays being mercury-free, BFR free, etc and their laptops having totally recyclable aluminum and glass enclosures - only to later deliberately make their laptops nearly impossible to repair and upgrade.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (51 replies)