Full title: Ubisoft says you "cannot complain" it shut down The Crew because you never actually owned it, and you weren't "deceived" by the lack of an offline version "to access a decade-old, discontinued video game"

Ubisoft's lawyers have responded to a class action lawsuit over the shutdown of The Crew, arguing that it was always clear that you didn't own the game and calling for a dismissal of the case outright.

The class action was filed in November 2024, and Ubisoft's response came in February 2025, though it's only come to the public's attention now courtesy of Polygon. The full response from Ubisoft attorney Steven A. Marenberg picks apart the claims of plaintiffs Matthew Cassell and Alan Liu piece by piece, but the most common refrain is that The Crew's box made clear both that the game required an internet connection and that Ubisoft retained the right to revoke access "to one or more specific online features" with a 30-day notice at its own discretion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your perspective seems to be you should get whatever you want regardless of the actual product you were sold and the terms of that sale. That’s not rational. You bought an online only game. If you wanted a single player offline mode to exist then you should have bought a game that had one.

[+] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Pretending authority is your only tactic. As the likely old-head here I deny you my permission to "be the adult in the room"

Call out use of argument from authority fallacy, call to his own authority instead.... Quite ironic.

Well you know what, I call upon the deep magic of rule 2 to remove your message (for the part I didn't quote, for those who wonder).

roll dice, get a critical failure "well fu..."

Anyway, please stay civil, no matter how heated a debate can become.

[–] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago

Eh, the argument was never civil. I don't like the whole schtick of "showing immense disrespect buuut not actually name-calling" i see so many lowbrow edgelords employ. That sulky teen shit makes me maldy as all get out. I get there's gotta be lines somewhere an i crossed em, but i gots to call a spade by its name.

Anyway have a great morning