this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
95 points (96.1% liked)

Socialism

6006 readers
25 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Anti-civ people could respond that a civilisation focused on war is particularly civilised.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

whether uncivilised people have 'war' is controversial; many people thi k war arose with civilisation

For example, the book Warless Societies and the Origin of War by Kelly argues that you need civilisation to have the sort of organisation and population density for war. A counterargument is that some great apes have been observed warring.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ants war too. Not saying that ants are uncivilized, but... you know...

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

https://d-place.org/parameters/SCCS1650#0/14/150 — 52 of 186 uncivilised peoples in this dataset have no war.

There's probably war without civilisation, but "more civilised means less war" is hard for me to accept.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)