this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

PC Gaming

11611 readers
886 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

We successfully shifted the GPUs responsibility from the 3k-4k€ GPU to the 200€ PSU. Fuck Nvidia.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Eh, it's also the connector's fault. Not saying they're not to blame for creating junk, but it's a bunch of companies (pcisig) who created the standard. Even Sapphire's implementation is flawed.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was Nvidia that designed the original connector and forced it upon the world. PCI has been trying to make it less bad, but it was standardized after it had already been created, not the other way around.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Overcurrent protection on each pin should definitely be mandated by the standard.

But it's important to keep in mind that Nvidia has 90% market share and can do whatever they want. If PCI standardized something Nvidia didn't agree with, then there simply would not be any implementations of the standard, and Nvidia cards would use a non-standard connector. It's that simple.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)