this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
61 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

9711 readers
735 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] banana 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I am hopeful for small modular reactors (SMR's). They have the potential for significant construction cost savings, are less of a risk from terrorism/disaster, and can often be located closer to the load (long power lines lose power).

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There have been a number of studies that have SMRs are being as expensive or higher than conventional nuclear, with the added downside of higher levels of waste, anywhere from 2 to 30 times as much as conventional nuclear depending on the tech used.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2111833119

Part of the reason for scaling up reactors in the first place was the expectation that output would scale faster than costs. That hasn't really panned out to the extent expected.

[–] banana 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks for sharing this, I didn't know how the waste compared to conventional nuclear.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)