this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
189 points (98.5% liked)

xkcd

11941 readers
443 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[desperately] Maybe this is from some country where they use commas as decimal points, and also as digit separators after the decimal, and also use random other characters for decoration???

https://explainxkcd.com/3102/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Isn't there also Indian way where it alternates between 2 zeros and 4 zeros?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 23 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

It's groups of two except for that the three numbers left of the decimal point are in a group of three. So 1,00,00,000 rather than 10,000,000, for example. 1,00,00,000 is a crore, 1,00,000 is a lakh

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 16 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know, I'm afraid. As I understand it, the base ten positional numbering system we use in most of the world (as in, the value of each individual digit is multiplied by ten a number of times based on its position in the number) originated in northern India, but the writing of the people that developed it did not use a lot of punctuation. The modern comma comes from Europe and I'm fairly sure that the idea of a thousands separator comes from Europeans trying to write big numbers in Roman numerals. Based on that I would assume that the British colonial period introduced the idea of using a comma as a thousands separator to India. However, while Europeans were used to thinking in thousands and millions, Indians were habitually thinking in lakhs and crores, so I assume they adjusted the commas to suit that. Since the separators are literally only there to make it easier to read and do not affect any of the maths you can do with it, I don't imagine Indians would have much reason to change their system

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)