Lisp

61 readers

3 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rglullis

defmacro

Thoughts on ecl & clisp (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by Ok_Specific_7749@alien.top to c/lisp

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personaly i found abcl a bad experience.
Thoughts on ecl & clisp ?

sbcl works nice & fine. But i't's the only lisp implementation i know.
There are good books on racket-scheme & chez-cheme.
The only book i know for lisp is, "Common lisp , a gentle introduction to symbolic computing".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ok_Specific_7749@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aah , i see to the right. But aren't the books "OLD ?"

[–] aartaka@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

CL is, like, fourty? years old now. These books describe the standardized language, so most of their gotchas apply to any conforming implementation. So yes, the books are "OLD", and yes, they are "GOOD".

[–] KaranasToll@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't common lisp old?