this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Lisp

53 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Personaly i found abcl a bad experience.
Thoughts on ecl & clisp ?

sbcl works nice & fine. But i't's the only lisp implementation i know.
There are good books on racket-scheme & chez-cheme.
The only book i know for lisp is, "Common lisp , a gentle introduction to symbolic computing".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rpiirp@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The only book i know for lisp is

My pet peeve: People never looking at the sidebar of this very subreddit.

[–] Ok_Specific_7749@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aah , i see to the right. But aren't the books "OLD ?"

[–] KaranasToll@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't common lisp old?

[–] aartaka@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

CL is, like, fourty? years old now. These books describe the standardized language, so most of their gotchas apply to any conforming implementation. So yes, the books are "OLD", and yes, they are "GOOD".

[–] arthurno1@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

People never looking at the sidebar of this very subreddit.

Welcome to Reddit :-). That is the common theme of all subreddits I am afraid.