this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
174 points (91.8% liked)

Flippanarchy

1339 readers
281 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross-posted from "TRUE communism!" by @Muaddib@sopuli.xyz in !politicalmemes@lemmy.world


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (32 children)

... You don't get it?

This is an Anarchist instance.

Anarchists are extremely critical of the concept of 'the State' itself, tend to want to either totally abolish it, or at least strip it down so much or break it apart that it essentially isn't a 'State' any more.

Tankies embrace, and essentially worship the State.

... Also, in basically every single recorded instance of a succesful or attempted leftist revolution in modern human history, tankies ally with anarchists to overthrow the existing State, and then murder all of them after they've established themselves as the new State or proto-State.

One could argue that it seems to be in the material interest of authoritarian statists to extend false allyship to 'fellow leftists', and then betray them as quickly as they abandon their ideal of a 'classless society' and begin to assert themselves as the new ruling class.

There's a 101 level answer for your 'why so antagonistic' question.

Tankies historically cry 'Unity! Unity!' and do exactly what you are doing, trying to shame those who are skeptical... and then the rhetoric flips on a dime and the cry switches to 'Purity! Faith!'

...

Also worth noting is your framing of this as antagonistic in the first place.

I guess you find the evidence of history thus far to largely be antagonistic to your worldview?

I don't know, I wouldn't want to put words in your mouth, but that is my assumption.

I could be wrong though.

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago (12 children)

The way you liberals need to define ideologies the US government taught you to hate as "religions" is pretty interesting to me.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

I've studied economics and poli sci academically, have degrees in both, did my own independent research, came to the conclusion that the anarchist perspective is ultimately the most useful approach to analyze and critique... all societies, throughout all history, with the least ideological blindspots, with the most at least broadly accurate predictive power.

But sure, ok, I am one of the liberals whom I frequently argued against and critqued, ok.

Anyways, do you have an actual retort, or just a form of ideologically flavored ad hominem?

-yawn-

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 25 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

just a form of ideologically flavored ad hominem?

Ridiculous statement for someone who incessantly calls the most predominant socialist tendency on earth a "religion."

Edit: also lmao poli sci and economics degree

"Excuse me, the only real socialists are people with professional level liberal ideological education"

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

You claimed I was brainwashed by the government, I told you I wasn't.

Your response is 'Ridiculous!' and then a strawman.

... this is evidently your strategy for fostering left-unity, to just attempt to rhetorically insult me until I submit to your way of thinking?

You 'argue' like a power tripping narcissist sociopath, it is actually funny to me that you seemingly lack awareness of how vindictive and manipulative you come across.

I guess the only good revolution is the one that is openly antagonistic to tbose whom it claims to represent, speak for, advocate for with unity.

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to foster left unity with you, because frankly to consider you an anarchist would be such rank anti-anarchist sectarianism that Hexbear mods would be correct to permaban me. You're a liberal.

Btw, I think that accusing anarcho-communists of having an ideology that inevitably leads to ecocide is pretty sectarian also (or again, maybe not sectarian. It's not sectarian for a liberal [you] to be anti-anarchist, just shitty), and you haven't engaged with this point but you're posting ziq's articles and this is one of their states positions so that's something you need to deal with for yourself.

You called Marxism a religion before my comment, which was about your initial ad hominem comparison to religion, and frankly suggesting that the ideologies that you are opposed to are the ones the US government wants you to oppose is an objective fact.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 11 points 14 hours ago

posting ziq's articles

LMAO holy shit what a toolbag

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)