NBA - Main

14 readers

2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[Seattle Times] 15 years after moving Sonics, now it’s the Thunder asking for publicly funded arena (www.seattletimes.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Attention4Sale@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

485 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lopea182@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (201 children)

I will never understand why public funds should pay for >50% of the funds for a privately owned sports clubs arena

[–] junkit33@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I'll never understand why people don't understand why this happens. It's so absurdly simple:

Team wants new stadium
Team demands current city pay for stadium, else team will run away to one of a dozen other cities who would happily pay for the stadium instead
Either current city pays up to not lose the team, or team relocates to city who will pay
The end

People can debate the positive/negative economics of it all day long, but it's really neither here nor there. Bringing in a pro sports team to your city is a politically super popular move, and politicians only care about whatever helps them win their next election.

[–] SpicyTigerPrawn@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'll never understand why people don't understand why this happens.

I don't understand why people who put getting/keeping a sports team above all other considerations think everyone else should be forced to help their favorite billionaire pay for it.

[–] junkit33@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Just democracy in a nutshell. Majority wins and way more voters want a team badly than those who don’t.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (198 replies)