this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
65 points (89.2% liked)

Fediverse

20724 readers
14 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Or another term which is more descriptive. This is the first thing people see when they type in Lemmy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (14 children)

Forums update threads by bumping, so threads from ten years ago can still be on the front page as long as they are active.

The term "link aggregator" was made to differentiate websites that are designed for threads to rapidly decay and be replaced by a constant flow of new content. If you tried to federate lemmy with a forum it wouldn't really work.

Maybe there's another term that could be used, but there needs to be a way to differentiate the two styles.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

The term link aggregator makes me think of a search engine. A forum is based on user content. Forums generally make lots of new threads too. The only way forum threads stay active is when people bump them by responding to it. Lemmy posts also stay on the front page longer if people keep responding to them.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Lemmy posts are still designed to decay and fall off the front page. The posts last longer if they have participation but the only way to make something last a long time is to sticky the post so it doesn't decay.

Forums aren't like that. Forum threads are meant to stay around as long as people bump them and they can be ancient, with hundreds of pages of comments, and the thread still keeps getting bumped because new content is added to the thread.

Also, the way comments are organized is different. Our comments are threaded so we can have a conversation between us in a comment chain, but forum comments are sequential. The comments section of every thread would look way different if it was a forum.

Forums are just structurally different. If you don't like "link aggregator" that's understandable, it's actually not very descriptive, but you still need to be able to differentiate between forums and whatever-the-heck this space is.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think this is kind of arbitrarily defining a forum even though I would absolutely, personally, consider this to be a form of forum as well

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Let's just call everything a website. It's all on the internet, right?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The important point is that people who are not familiar with what Lemmy is can understand it feom reading its description. Other suggestions are possible too.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Digg and Reddit invented the terminology and I don't think people are unfamiliar with it.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I vaguely remember the term from yCombinator which is exclusively links and does not have communities.

Even when using Reddit for many years in the past I never heard the term. It seems like Reddit too realized that it was not a good term for marketing.

According to NATOpedia Reddit is also a forum and "social news aggregation platform

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit

Reddit (/ˈrɛdɪt/ ⓘ RED-it) is an American proprietary social news aggregation and forum social media platform.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)