this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
357 points (95.4% liked)

Programming

21556 readers
252 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is stupid pedantry. By that logic literally nothing is complex because everything is made up of simple parts.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

cryptic != complex. Are they cryptic? yes. Are they complex? not really, if you can understand "one or more" or "zero or more" and some other really simple concepts like "one of these" or "not one of these" or "this is optional". You could explain these to a child. It's only because they look cryptic that people think they are complex. Unless you start using backreferences and advanced concepts like those (which are not usually needed in most cases) they are very simple. long != complex

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok I can see you haven't actually come across any complex regexes yet...

(Which is probably a good thing tbh - if you're writing complex regexes you're doing it wrong.)

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

i haven't come across many. But i have written a lot.