this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10488 readers
598 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago (7 children)

It's easily the weakest case ever put forth attempting prosecution in Canada. Pure disgrace attempting to cash in on the 51% majority in the court of public opinion.
A legal embarassment.

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I've heard a few analysts say that the verdict is not a surprise. I'm not a lawyer, care to explain why you consider this case weak?

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I'm not a lawyer either, but reading the judge's verdict, it sounds like the only evidence the prosecution had was the woman's testimony. The defence had video recordings of the women verbally consenting. Kinda hard to prove beyond a doubt that the woman did not consent when it's on video. Not that some non-consenting stuff didn't happen when the video was turned off but again, a guilty verdict requires no doubt.

That's what the CBC article is about. How sexual assault victims often don't come forward since securing a conviction is incredibly difficult on testimony alone.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Just a nitpick, but the legal term is beyond a reasonable doubt. So if 5 people see me do something, there's no reasonable doubt. But if 5 people see me do something, I have an identical twin, and a couple people who actually know me were hanging out with me somewhere else, well maybe those other 5 people saw my hypothetical twin.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)