politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I expect the DNC to refuse to respond in kind, which is categorically insane under these circumstances.
There is a strong argument to be made that if Dems successfully restructure CA districts to make up for the TX seats, then it will start setting a slippery precedent for how states are to respond to federal government organization, basically throwing the three branches of government out the window. When states just start setting their own number of seats it removes the will of the people and now we're just playing congressional flash-mob and federal legislation and budgeting dies, to be replaced by who-knows-what, and it's very likely there are GOP strategists who are counting on this because they already have an alternative planned. ("Congress is over, we now are going to use Grokgress! Powered by X, the Everything App!")
That is why this entire standoff is very, very worrying. When this kind of fighting starts, we are truly seeing an end to democratic process and the "united" part of the United States.
On the other hand, there is an even stronger argument to be made that the game is already over, that we lost democracy already and there are mountains of evidence to back it up, well beyond the stupid Trump spectacle that is distracting everyone. The Republican party has been working tirelessly to strip states of their rights and have successfully sabotaged the judicial branch of government as well as the executive. They are actively working on ways to dismantle the legislative branch but it's harder. Dems are in the position to either let them do this, or pull the plug on their own terms.
I have no idea which way it will go or what the after-effects will be, but it's starting to look like it's over. The system is running on inertia but in a decade or less we may see a proper dissolution of the states and the implementation of some kind of corporate feudalism kleptocracy and various blocs of states like Cascadia forming their own micro-unions.
Good. People fear this outcome, but I would welcome it. It would allow for greater representation and actually allow the West Coast to join the 21st century. We could keep more of our money, complete interstate high-speed rail, set energy policy, etc.
Right now we're a married couple living in one house, and one partner is abusive, controlling, and insane. The right answer is not "figure out how to make it work." And yes, I know factions don't live cleanly according to state lines, but it's close enough now and only getting more voluntarily segregated as time moves on.
I agree, if we built a new coalition of allied, prosperous states with their own constitution towards fairness and equality without fear of federal interference it would be a huge benefit to the people who live there.
The part that makes this outcome less than ideal is that the former US federal system will still have control of the world's most powerful military, and I don't really expect that particular faction to want peaceful and amicable relationships with their neighbors. We're going to just see a replay of the Russia/Ukraine situation where unhinged tyrants prosper on starting endless wars with former members of their union.