politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Trump Claims He Banned Epstein "Before It Was Cool"—Timeline Says Otherwise
Palm Beach, FL — In yet another dramatic twist in the never-ending saga of “Donald Trump vs. Reality,” the former president has once again boldly claimed he “kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago long before anyone else knew he was bad news.” According to Trump, this decisive moral stand occurred sometime around the moment he invented the word “covfefe.”
During a recent rally, Trump told supporters, “I was the only one who had the guts to throw Epstein out of my club. Nobody else did it. I did it early. Very early. People were amazed. Some say it was the earliest ban in history.”
There’s just one problem: that’s not true.
The Receipts Public records and multiple reports, including a well-sourced 2002 profile in Vanity Fair (back when Trump was still on speaking terms with the publication), suggest Trump and Epstein remained cordial well after Epstein's behavior was widely whispered about among the elite. In fact, Epstein was a regular guest at Mar-a-Lago, with Trump famously quoted as saying: “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” Ah yes, the telltale language of a man morally outraged.
Despite Trump’s insistence that he heroically ejected Epstein "sometime in the 90s, probably earlier, maybe even before I built Mar-a-Lago, who knows," multiple reports peg the actual incident—reportedly involving a dispute over Epstein flirting with the daughter of a member—closer to 2007. That just so happens to coincide with Epstein’s first major run-in with the law, which makes Trump’s claim sound less like principled foresight and more like “Oh no, the yacht is sinking—time to jump ship.”
Revisionist History for Dummies Trump’s ability to rewrite his own timeline is nothing short of Olympic. He could make George Orwell blush. From claiming he opposed the Iraq War (he didn’t), to saying he saw “thousands” of Muslims cheering in New Jersey on 9/11 (he didn’t), to asserting he won the 2020 election (he didn’t), Trump’s relationship with the truth is, at best, on a trial separation. His Epstein claim is just the latest entry in the ever-expanding “Trump Mythos,” a rich fictional universe where Trump is always the hero, never the villain, and definitely never a guy who partied with Epstein years after everyone else started asking, “Hey, what’s up with that guy?”
Final Verdict Once again, Trump has proven that when faced with an inconvenient truth, he’ll reach for a Sharpie and just draw a new one. As always, the truth is out there—just not at Mar-a-Lago, and definitely not at Trump rallies. Coming up next: Trump insists he warned the Titanic about the iceberg—personally.
I don't think they know what twist means in the context they used it. This shit was extremely expected.