this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
471 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2650 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Windows Phone gets revenge on YouTube from the grave by helping users bypass its ad-blocker-blocker::Windows Phone to the rescue. A lot of YouTube users want to know how to get around the new annoying YouTube pop-up telling viewers to disable their ad-blocker.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Robaque@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Yes and no. Cool project but I gotta be honest I'm not a big fan of Louis Rossman / FUTO's "open source but not free " stance.

[–] Devouring@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It's open source and it's free. You're free to pay too if you want to support them. Software costs money.

What Louis is protecting against in his license is repurposing the app with malware and ads like was repeatedly done with new pipe. Pick your poison.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No! Libertarian GPL or DIE!

./s, kinda

[–] Devouring@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I understand your philosophy there or you're joking. Why is GPL so important? Isn't the purpose of open-source to validate that no funny business is happening?

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is a purpose of open source.

First, I was wrong in linking libertarian with GPL, I was thinking of permissive licenses like MIT. GPL is a CopyLeft license, in that it forbids proprietization. MIT is more like, do whatever the hell you want, you just can’t sue me.

The joke should have been "Libertarian MIT License or DIE!"

I think MIT is actually a pretty rough license, because it allows someone to come along, take the open source work, add anything, or virtually nothing and then start selling it as their own while keeping any new code secret... when they got it for free. I'm mostly against that, but there are people who believe strongly in that type of license.

I'm more in favor of GPL like licenses (not prescriptively, but preferentially) because they force the work and its derivatives to be shared by the community, for the work to continue to be open source.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)